I find myself getting more efficient with this whole game making thing over time. Back in 10th grade I had no idea what I was doing, but was happy to finally have a general direction to run in. I found out games were made through programming, took a few Java classes, and went to Google for the rest.
I figured out lots of things on my own, like object oriented structures and game specific things like animations, health bars, menu flow, music playback, and collision detection. What never crossed my mind back then was listening to how others created games. If I did, I'd know about certain things that just don't work and could have side-stepped a lot of problems. Also, my code would be legible.
Take a peek into the mind of a 10th grade developer in training after the break.
I had a Dragon Ball Z RPG, a Zelda-style RPG, a Pokemon game, and an arcade game meant for iPads. Of all of those only 2 are going to see the light of day eventually. Another reason why I did four at once was for those frustrating times when I got stuck on a bug.
Having multiple projects allowed me to switch to another one that wasn't broken until I got back to the first with a refreshed mind, often allowing me to find solutions I overlooked.
My current way of doing things is a lot more efficient. Although I can still see merit in my former method, I don't think pushing problems and juggling too many titles makes for a happy development cycle.
So in short, my old way of doing things was:
- Get Idea
- Doodle on Paper
- Make Placeholder sprites
- Make a menu leading to gameplay
- Make menu sprites
- Dress up menu
- Make simple gameplay loop
- Edit sprites frequently
- Build on everything until the game is done
None of these games got anywhere near completion. But I did learn a lot, built sprite making skills, and got a lot of excitement out of my system.
To see how my methods have changed a few years later, read: A College Student's Development Process
To see how my methods have changed a few years later, read: A College Student's Development Process
No comments:
Post a Comment